Disney’s upcoming live-action adaptation of Lilo & Stitch, set to premiere on May 23, 2025, has ignited a significant backlash among fans, leading to calls for a boycott. The controversy centers around the portrayal of the character Agent Pleakley, whose cross-dressing disguises in the original 2002 animated film have been omitted in the remake.
In the original Lilo & Stitch, Pleakley, an alien tasked with capturing Stitch, frequently dons wigs and dresses to blend in with humans, providing both comedic relief and a subtle nod to gender fluidity. This aspect of his character was celebrated for its humor and progressive representation. However, in the live-action trailer, Pleakley, portrayed by Billy Magnussen, is seen only in male attire, with no indication of his iconic disguises.
Director Dean Fleischer Camp addressed the omission in a TikTok video, stating, “I have had people message me saying, ‘Why is Pleakley not wearing the dress?’ And I just want to say, I tried… I tried.” He shared concept art depicting Pleakley in a red wig and floral dress, indicating his intention to retain the original characterization. However, Camp explained that the studio opted for a different approach, utilizing a device that allows Pleakley and his partner Dr. Jumba to appear human without physical disguises, citing challenges in translating the humor of their disguises to live action.
Fan Reactions and Accusations
The decision has sparked outrage among fans, who accuse Disney of regressing in terms of inclusivity and creative daring. Social media platforms are rife with comments expressing disappointment and frustration. One user remarked, “Disney are such cowards if they don’t include Pleakley in a wig and dress… no way a movie made for an audience 20 plus years … “.
Others speculate that the change was influenced by the current political climate, suggesting that Disney aimed to avoid potential backlash from conservative audiences. A Reddit user commented, “Because it’s changing something from the original product that was important to that character, it being specifically about drag is irrelevant. It could be a character who loves ice cream not loving ice cream and fans of the original product would be mad” .
Broader Implications and Previous Controversies
This is not the first time Disney’s live-action remakes have … for altering beloved characters. The live-action Mulan received backlash for omitting the character Mushu and the musical elements, while The Little Mermaid faced scrutiny over character designs. These changes have led to accusations that Disney is prioritizing commercial interests over creative integrity and fan expectations.
The Lilo & Stitch controversy also raises questions about representation and the importance of maintaining character traits that resonate with audiences. Pleakley’s cross-dressing was not only a source of humor but also a subtle challenge to gender norms, making his character stand out in Disney’s animated lineup. By removing this aspect, critics argue that the remake loses a layer of depth and charm that contributed to the original’s enduring appeal.
The Cast and Production Choices
Despite the controversy, the live-action remake boasts a notable cast. Maia Kealoha stars as Lilo, with Sydney Elizebeth Agudong as her sister Nani. Chris Sanders returns to voice Stitch, a role he originated in the animated film. Zach Galifianakis plays Dr. Jumba, and Billy Magnussen portrays Pleakley. The film is directed by Dean Fleischer Camp, known for his work on Marcel the Shell with Shoes On.
The decision to use a device to alter Pleakley and Jumba’s appearances, rather than physical disguises, reflects a broader trend in Disney’s live-action adaptations to ground fantastical elements in realism. However, this approach has been met with mixed reactions, as fans often feel that the whimsical and imaginative aspects of the originals are lost in translation.
The uproar surrounding the Lilo & Stitch live-action remake underscores the challenges Disney faces in balancing modernization with fidelity to original content. While the studio aims to reintroduce classic stories to new audiences, alterations to beloved characters risk alienating long-time fans. As the film’s release approaches, it remains to be seen how these controversies will impact its reception and whether Disney will address the concerns raised by its audience.
